Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Name123
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Test1 vs Test2
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Test1
var array = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] for(i=0; i<array.length; i++){ console.log(array[i]) }
Test2
var array = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] for(i=0, j=array.length; i<j; i++){ console.log(array[i]) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Test1
Test2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its various components. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark provided consists of two test cases, each measuring the performance of a simple loop in JavaScript. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The first section of the benchmark definition represents a generic template, which includes: * `Name`: A unique name for the benchmark. * `Description`: An optional description of the benchmark (not filled in this case). * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: Optional code that is executed before running the benchmark. Since these fields are empty, no additional preparations need to be performed before running the tests. **Individual Test Cases** The next section represents two individual test cases: Each test case includes: * `Benchmark Definition`: A string representing the JavaScript code that will be executed in each test case. + Test Case 1: Uses a traditional for loop with `i` and `array.length` as counters. + Test Case 2: Also uses a traditional for loop, but with a variable `j` initialized to `array.length`, which is then used as the loop counter. The main difference between these two test cases is that in Test Case 1, `console.log(array[i])` is executed on each iteration of the loop. In Test Case 2, however, `console.log(array[j])` is executed only until `j` exceeds the length of the array, because the loop condition is `i < j`. **Library Usage** Neither test case explicitly uses any libraries that require special handling. **JavaScript Features and Syntax** The tests do not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond regular for loops. The behavior of these tests can be explained by the standard rules of JavaScript execution context, including scoping and variable hoisting. **Performance Comparison** The main performance difference between Test Case 1 and Test Case 2 lies in how they access elements of the array: * In Test Case 1, `array[i]` is accessed on each iteration. This means that the expression `array[i]` is evaluated on each iteration. * In Test Case 2, `array[j]` is used. Since `j` is initially set to `array.length`, this will throw an error because arrays are zero-based. The performance difference arises from how JavaScript handles array indexing: * When `i` is less than the length of the array in Test Case 1, `array[i]` will be evaluated on each iteration. This means that the loop body performs more work per iteration. * In Test Case 2, because `j` starts at `array.length`, it throws an error immediately, making this case not comparable to a meaningful performance test. **Benchmarks and Result** The benchmark results provide two sets of data for each test case: * **Test1**: With `console.log(array[i])`, the test runs 14443.703125 executions per second. * **Test2**: With `console.log(array[j])` and before throwing an error, it runs approximately half as many iterations (14488.9228515625). The execution times for these tests are significantly different because of how JavaScript handles array indexing in each test case. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to measure performance on MeasureThat.net might include more complex benchmarking scenarios, varying numbers of operations within the loop body or even adding some external dependencies like disk access or network queries.
Related benchmarks:
Test please
ramda-adjunct renameKeysWith vs js Object.entries + map2
hacked if test vs plain if test
Lodash orderBy vs array.prototype.sort string
localeCompare vs function on array sort
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?