Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
foobar-ccmpcp-3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
querySelector vs querySelectorAll vs getElementsByTagName
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<html> <head> </head> <body> <div id=''></div> </body> </html>
Tests:
querySelector
document.querySelector('body');
querySelectorAll
document.querySelectorAll('body');
getElementsByTagName
document.getElementsByTagName('body');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelector
querySelectorAll
getElementsByTagName
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the JavaScript code to be executed for each test case. In this case, there are three test cases: 1. `document.querySelector('body');` 2. `document.querySelectorAll('body');` 3. `document.getElementsByTagName('body');` These test cases aim to measure the performance of different methods for selecting elements in an HTML document. **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing three options: 1. **`querySelector`**: Uses the `querySelector` method to select a single element based on its CSS selector. 2. **`querySelectorAll`**: Uses the `querySelectorAll` method to select all elements that match a CSS selector. 3. **`getElementsByTagName`**: Uses the `getElementsByTagName` method to get an array of all elements with a given tag name. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of each option: 1. **`querySelector`**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, especially for simple selectors. * Cons: May not work as expected if the DOM is highly dynamic or complex. 2. **`querySelectorAll`**: * Pros: Can handle more complex selectors and can be used to select all elements that match a pattern. * Cons: May be slower than `querySelector` for simple selections, especially in older browsers. 3. **`getElementsByTagName`**: * Pros: Simple and widely supported, but may not work as expected with complex selectors or dynamic DOMs. * Cons: Can be slower than the other two options, especially in newer browsers. **Library and Purpose** In this benchmark, the `Document` object is being used to interact with the HTML document. The `Document` object provides various methods for selecting elements, including `querySelector`, `querySelectorAll`, and `getElementsByTagName`. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that are not widely supported. **Other Alternatives** If you need to measure the performance of other DOM selection methods, such as: * Using `DOMParser` to parse an HTML string * Using `createDocumentFragment` and `appendChild` to create a new element * Using `getElementsByClassName` or `getAttribute` to select elements based on class names or attribute values You can add additional test cases to the benchmark to measure their performance as well. Overall, this benchmark provides a good starting point for measuring the performance of different DOM selection methods in JavaScript. By comparing these options, developers can choose the best approach for their specific use case and ensure optimal performance in their web applications.
Related benchmarks:
DOM Selection
Selector Comparisons with Example Shop Data
querySelectorAll head vs unrestricted
innerText 2
Closest or loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?