Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operator SM
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs Spread
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
const foo = { foo: 1, bar: true, baz:'baz' }; const result = Object.assign({ foo: 2, bar: false }, foo );
Spread
const foo = { foo: 1, bar: true, baz:'baz' }; const result = { foo: 2, bar: false, ...foo };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
Spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The MeasureThat.net website allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark is called "Object.assign vs spread operator SM". This benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: `Object.assign` and the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** The benchmark tests the following options: 1. **Object.assign**: This method creates a new object by copying properties from an existing object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This syntax creates a new object with the given key-value pairs, using the spread operator to merge objects. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Object.assign**: * Pros: * Widely supported in most browsers * Well-documented and widely used in the JavaScript community * Cons: * Can be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of function calls * May not work correctly for complex object structures or null/undefined values * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: * Generally faster than `Object.assign` * More concise and readable code * Cons: * Less widely supported in older browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer) * May not work correctly for complex object structures or null/undefined values **Library Used** In the benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, `Object.assign` is a built-in JavaScript method. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). It allows for more concise and readable object creation. **Other Considerations** When deciding between these two approaches, consider the following: * If you're targeting older browsers that don't support the spread operator, `Object.assign` might be a better choice. * If performance is critical, the spread operator might be a better option due to its generally faster execution time. * In terms of readability and maintainability, the spread operator can result in more concise code. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for merging objects or creating new objects include: * **Object.create()**: This method creates a new object with the given prototype. * **Array.prototype.reduce()**: This method applies a function to each element of an array and returns a new array. * **lodash's _.merge()` method**: This method merges two or more objects into one. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, readability, and maintainability compared to `Object.assign` and the spread operator.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed -> Number vs Math.round
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
toFixed() vs String(Math.floor()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?