Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array: spread operator vs push #2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spread operator vs push function
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator
var arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100]; arr = [...arr, 101];
push function
var arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100]; arr.push(101);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator
push function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by a JSON object that contains information about the test cases and their corresponding JavaScript code. The benchmark compares two approaches: using the spread operator (`...`) to add elements to an array, and using the `push()` method to add elements to an array. **Options Compared** The options being compared are: 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This approach uses the spread operator to create a new array by copying the existing elements of the original array and adding a new element to it. 2. **Push Function**: This approach uses the `push()` method to add an element to the end of an array. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: More concise and expressive code, can be used with other arrays and iterables. + Cons: Can be slower than using `push()` due to the overhead of creating a new array. * **Push Function**: + Pros: Faster execution time because it modifies the existing array without creating a new one. + Cons: Less concise code, can lead to confusing variable names. **Library and Purpose** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, the use of modern JavaScript features such as `...` (spread operator) suggests that the benchmark is running on a relatively modern JavaScript engine. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`) which is a relatively recent feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This means that older JavaScript engines may not support this syntax, which could affect the execution times of the test cases. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some other ways to add an element to an array: * **Array.prototype.concat()**: Similar to using `push()`, but creates a new array instead of modifying the existing one. * **Array.prototype.unshift()**: Adds an element to the beginning of the array instead of the end. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and code readability implications compared to the spread operator and push function approaches.
Related benchmarks:
Array: spread operator vs push
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
Array.push vs Spread operator
JS array spread operator vs push
Array .push() vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?