Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array: spread operator vs push
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spread operator vs push function
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator
var arr = [1, 2, 3]; arr = [...arr, 4];
push function
var arr = [1, 2, 3]; arr.push(4);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator
push function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The test is comparing two ways to add an element to an array in JavaScript: 1. Using the spread operator (`...`) 2. Using the `push()` method **Options Compared** In this case, we only have two options compared: using the spread operator and using the `push()` method. Pros and Cons of Each Approach: * **Spread Operator (...") + Pros: - Can be used to create a new array with additional elements. - Can be used to merge arrays in a concise way. + Cons: - Can lead to higher memory allocation due to the creation of a new array object. - May not be as efficient as using `push()` for large arrays. * **Push() Method** + Pros: - More efficient than using the spread operator, especially for large arrays. - Does not create a new array object, only modifies the existing one. + Cons: - Less readable and less intuitive for some developers. - May lead to issues if the `push()` method is called on a non-array value. **Library Used** There doesn't appear to be any library being used in this benchmark. The script and HTML preparation codes are empty, which suggests that the test is designed to isolate the JavaScript engine's behavior for this specific operation. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** Neither of the options being compared uses a special feature or syntax. However, it's worth noting that using the spread operator (`...`) was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and has since become a standard part of modern JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for adding elements to an array, some examples include: * Using `Array.prototype.concat()` or `Array.prototype.pushAll()` * Creating a new array using the `Array.from()` method * Using a library like Lodash's `_.push()` function Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs and use cases. **Benchmark Result Interpretation** The provided benchmark result shows two runs, one for each option being compared. The "ExecutionsPerSecond" value represents the number of executions per second, which is an important metric when measuring performance. In this case, the `push()` method appears to be slightly faster than using the spread operator, possibly due to its efficiency and lack of unnecessary array object creation. However, the difference may not be significant in most scenarios, and other factors like memory allocation and garbage collection might also impact performance. It's essential to consider these results in context, taking into account the specific use case and environment where the benchmark is being used.
Related benchmarks:
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
Array.push vs Spread operator
JS array spread operator vs push
Array .push() vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?