Benchmark: imperative-prop-selector3

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.26.1/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var mock = {
  name: 'José Manuel',
  surname: 'Lucas',
  organization: {
    id: 11,
    selfcare: {
      id: 12355,
      customization: {
        colors: {
          foreground: '#fff',
          background: {
            primary: '#ff0000',
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
};

const getName = ({ name }) => name;

const getOrganization = obj => obj && obj.organization;

const getSelfcare = (obj) => {
  const a = getOrganization(obj);
  return a && a.selfcare;
};

const getCustomization = (obj) => {
  const a = getSelfcare(obj);
  return a && a.customization;
};

const getColors = (obj) => {
  const a = getCustomization(obj);
  return a && a.colors;
};

var imperativePath = (obj) => {
  const a = getColors(obj);
  return a && a.foreground;
};

const prop = R.prop;
var ramdaPath = function(obj) {
  return prop(
    'foreground', 
    prop(
      'colors', 
      prop(
        'customization',
        prop(
          'selfcare',
          prop(
            'organization',
            obj,
          ),
        ),
      ),
    ),
  );
}

// Ensuring that all functions work properly
if (ramdaPath(mock) !== '#fff') {
  throw new Error('Invalid ramda path');
}

if (imperativePath(mock) !== '#fff') {
  throw new Error('Invalid imperative path');
}

Tests:

Imperative path
imperativePath(mock);
Ramda path
ramdaPath(mock);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Imperative path
Ramda path

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to access nested properties in an object: Imperative Path and Ramda Path.

**Imperative Path**

Imperative Path uses a series of chained functions to access the `foreground` property. The chain is as follows:

1. `getColors(obj)` returns the `colors` object.
2. `getCustomization(a)` returns the `customization` object.
3. `getSelfcare(b)` returns the `selfcare` object.
4. `getOrganization(c)` returns the `organization` object.
5. `imperativePath(obj)` finally returns the `foreground` property.

This approach is simple and easy to read, but it may lead to slower performance due to the overhead of function calls.

**Ramda Path**

Ramda Path uses a more functional programming style to access the same nested properties. The chain is as follows:

1. `prop('organization', obj)` returns the `organization` object.
2. `prop('selfcare', a)` returns the `selfcare` object.
3. `prop('customization', b)` returns the `customization` object.
4. `prop('colors', c)` returns the `colors` object.
5. `prop('foreground', d)` finally returns the `foreground` property.

This approach is often faster and more efficient because it avoids function calls and uses a single, optimized path through the Ramda library.

**Pros and Cons**

* Imperative Path:
	+ Pros: Easy to read and understand.
	+ Cons: May lead to slower performance due to function calls.
* Ramda Path:
	+ Pros: Often faster and more efficient due to optimization by Ramda.
	+ Cons: Can be less intuitive for developers without experience with functional programming.

**Library**

The benchmark uses the Ramda library, which is a functional programming library for JavaScript. It provides a series of optimized functions for common operations like array manipulation, data transformation, and path resolution. In this case, `prop` is used to access nested properties in an object.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark beyond the use of functional programming with Ramda.

**Other Alternatives**

Other alternatives for accessing nested properties could include:

* Using a library like Lodash, which provides similar functionality to Ramda.
* Implementing your own path resolution function from scratch.
* Using a more imperative approach, such as using a recursive function or a loop.

However, these alternatives may not be optimized for performance and might lead to slower results compared to the Ramda Path used in this benchmark.

Related benchmarks:

imperative-prop-selector3 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Imperative path vs Ramda path

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Imperative path

Ramda path

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):