Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object merge vs library merge TomekTest
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs jQuery extend vs Immutable merge vs Ramda merge
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type='text/javascript' src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/immutable/3.8.2/immutable.min.js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js'></script> <script type='text/javascript' src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { a: "hello", b: true, c: 7 }; var other = Object.assign({}, { b: false, d: [ 1,2 ] }, params);
jQuery extend
var params = { a: "hello", b: true, c: 7 }; var other = $.extend({}, { b: false, d: [ 1,2 ] }, params);
Immutable merge
var params = Immutable.fromJS({ a: "hello", b: true, c: 7 }); var other = params.merge({ b: false, d: [ 1,2 ] });
Ramda merge
var params = { a: "hello", b: true, c: 7 }; var other = R.merge({ b: false, d: [ 1,2 ] }, params);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
jQuery extend
Immutable merge
Ramda merge
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring JavaScript performance is crucial, and MeasureThat.net provides a great platform for benchmarking various libraries and approaches. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests the performance of four different approaches to merge objects: Object.assign (native JavaScript), jQuery.extend (a popular jQuery utility), Immutable.merge (from the Immutable.js library), and Ramda.merge (from the Ramda functional programming library). **Options Compared** Here's a brief overview of each option: 1. **Object.assign**: A native JavaScript method that merges two or more objects into one, overwriting any existing properties. 2. **jQuery.extend**: A jQuery utility function that allows you to merge multiple objects into one, preserving the source order of properties. 3. **Immutable.merge**: A function from the Immutable.js library that creates a new object by merging two or more immutable objects, preserving their structure and data. 4. **Ramda.merge**: A higher-order function from the Ramda functional programming library that merges two or more objects into one, using a predictable and consistent merge strategy. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Object.assign**: * Pros: Fast, lightweight, and widely supported (native JavaScript). * Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully (e.g., overwriting existing properties without warning). 2. **jQuery.extend**: * Pros: Convenient, well-documented, and widely used in the jQuery community. * Cons: Adds additional overhead due to jQuery's library dependencies and can be slower than native JavaScript approaches. 3. **Immutable.merge**: * Pros: Preserves immutability and structure of original objects, which can lead to predictable behavior and easier debugging. * Cons: Can introduce significant overhead due to the creation of new immutable objects, especially for large datasets. 4. **Ramda.merge**: * Pros: Predictable and consistent merge strategy, which can lead to better performance and fewer surprises in complex data merging scenarios. * Cons: May require additional setup and learning due to its functional programming roots. **Library and Purpose** 1. **Immutable.js**: A library for working with immutable data structures, providing a predictable and thread-safe way to manage data changes. 2. **Ramda**: A functional programming library that provides a set of higher-order functions for data manipulation and transformation. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None mentioned in the provided JSON. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to merge objects, consider: 1. **Lodash.merge**: Another popular utility library that offers various merge strategies. 2. **ES6 Object Spread Operator**: A modern JavaScript feature that allows you to create new objects by spreading existing ones. 3. **Custom implementation using JavaScript's `Object.create()` and `Object.assign()` methods**. In conclusion, the choice of approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference. MeasureThat.net provides a valuable platform for benchmarking different libraries and approaches to help you make informed decisions about your codebase.
Related benchmarks:
Object merge vs library merge
Object merge vs library merge Tomek
mergeWith lodash vs immutable
object spread vs immutable-js setIn vs mori hashmap vs immer
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?