Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
sdfsdafsewra
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark compares two approaches for creating an array by concatenating another array: the traditional `concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: This test case uses the traditional `concat()` method to concatenate an array with another array containing some values. 2. **spread operator**: This test case uses the new ES6 spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by spreading the values from another array. **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing two options: * Traditional `concat()` method * New ES6 spread operator (`...`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Traditional `concat()` method**: * Pros: + Widely supported and well-established. + Easy to understand and implement. * Cons: + Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new array object. + May lead to memory allocation issues if not used carefully. 2. **New ES6 spread operator (`...`)**: * Pros: + Faster than traditional `concat()` method (as it avoids creating a new array object). + More concise and expressive code. * Cons: + Less widely supported (older browsers may not support it). + May be less intuitive for developers who are not familiar with it. **Library Used** There is no library explicitly used in this benchmark. The tests only rely on the JavaScript language features being compared. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The ES6 spread operator (`...`) is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for creating a new array by spreading the values from another array. This feature is not supported in older browsers, so it's likely that only modern browsers will execute this test case. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to the traditional `concat()` method or the ES6 spread operator, you could consider using other methods like: * `Array.prototype.push()`: This method appends new elements to the end of an array and returns the length of the updated array. * `Array.prototype.splice()`: This method modifies the array by removing or replacing existing elements and returning an array of removed elements. However, these alternatives may not be as concise or expressive as using the spread operator, but they can still achieve the desired result.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array concat vs spread operator vs push #3
spread operator vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?