Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.round 1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Always vs If true vs If false (1) vs If false (1.25)
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Always
Math.round(584*1)
If true
1 != 1 ? Math.round(584*1) : 584
If false (1)
1.25 != 1 ? Math.round(584*1) : 584
If false (1.25)
1.25 != 1 ? Math.round(584*1.25) : 584
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Always
If true
If false (1)
If false (1.25)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON defines a simple JavaScript microbenchmark. The `Name` field is set to "Math.round 1", indicating that this is a test of the `Math.round()` function. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, four different options are compared: 1. **Always**: This option tests the `Math.round()` function with a fixed value (`584*1`) regardless of any condition. 2. **If true**: This option tests the `Math.round()` function only if the condition is true (i.e., `1 != 1`). If the condition is false, the function returns its original input (`584`). 3. **If false (1)**: This option tests the `Math.round()` function with a value modified by the condition `1.25 != 1`. If the condition is true, the function receives an additional decimal place (`584*1.25`). If the condition is false, it returns its original input (`584`). 4. **If false (1.25)**: This option tests the `Math.round()` function with a value modified by the condition `1.25 != 1`. In this case, the function receives an additional decimal place if the condition is false. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Always**: This approach provides a baseline for comparison, as it tests the function under ideal conditions (no branching or conditional logic). However, it may not accurately reflect real-world usage patterns. * **If true**: This approach tests the function when the condition is true, which can be more representative of common scenarios where the condition evaluates to true. However, if the condition is false, the function returns its original input, which might not align with real-world expectations. * **If false (1)** and **If false (1.25)**: These approaches test the function under specific conditions that are less common than the "Always" or "If true" scenarios. While they provide valuable insight into how the function behaves in these edge cases, they may not be as representative of typical usage patterns. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmark definitions use any external libraries. The `Math.round()` function is a built-in JavaScript method that does not require any additional dependencies. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the benchmark definitions explicitly use special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard `Math.round()` function. **Other Alternatives** If you were to create your own microbenchmark using MeasureThat.net, you could explore other options such as: * Testing different mathematical functions (e.g., `Math.pow()`, `Math.sin()`) * Comparing performance of different data structures or algorithms (e.g., arrays, objects, sorting algorithms) * Measuring the impact of caching, memoization, or other optimization techniques on performance * Creating more complex benchmark scenarios that involve multiple functions, variables, or conditional statements Keep in mind that when creating your own benchmarks, it's essential to consider the specific requirements and constraints of your use case, as well as the potential for skewing results through factors like caching, instrumentation overhead, or measurement variability.
Related benchmarks:
Floating Point ToFixed
Rounding methods
Decimal rounding
toFixed vs round with epsilon
Math.round vs Number.isInteger
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?