Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Compare lodash javascript
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
fd vs fdsfsd
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
let a = 1; for(i=0; i<100; i++){a+=i}
Tests:
fd
let a = 1; for(i=0; i<100; i++){a+=i}
fdsfsd
let a = 1; for(i=0; i<100; i++){a+=i}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
fd
fdsfsd
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and discussed. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare different approaches to iterating over an array in JavaScript. The test case uses the `lodash` library, which provides utility functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string transformation, and functional programming. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is a simple loop that increments a variable `a` 100 times: ```javascript let a = 1; for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) { a += i; } ``` This loop is designed to be executed multiple times during the benchmarking process. **Html Preparation Code** The html preparation code includes a script tag that loads the `lodash` library: ```html <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script> ``` This ensures that the `lodash` library is available for use during the benchmarking process. **Comparison** The comparison being performed here is between two different approaches to iterating over an array: 1. **Native JavaScript Loop**: The script preparation code uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over an array. 2. **Lodash's `forEach` Method**: The html preparation code includes the `lodash` library, which provides a `forEach` method for iterating over arrays. The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of these two approaches on different devices and browsers. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Native JavaScript Loop**: + Pros: widely supported, low overhead. + Cons: may be slower due to the need to increment a variable manually. * **Lodash's `forEach` Method**: + Pros: more concise, eliminates manual loop management. + Cons: relies on the `lodash` library, which can introduce additional overhead. **Other Considerations** The benchmark also considers other factors, such as: * **Browser and Device**: The benchmark is run on different devices (Desktop) and browsers (Chromium 71). * **Execution Speed**: The benchmark measures the number of executions per second for each test case. * **Test Name**: The benchmark runs multiple test cases with the same `Benchmark Definition` but different `Test Names`. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string transformation, and functional programming. In this benchmark, the `lodash.forEach` method is used to iterate over an array. Other alternatives could be: * Using native JavaScript's `for...of` loop or `map()` function instead of `forEach`. * Implementing a custom iteration mechanism using native JavaScript functions (e.g., `reduce()`, `filter()`). * Avoiding the use of external libraries altogether and relying on built-in JavaScript features. Overall, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of different approaches to iterating over arrays in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
uniqBy performance
findIndex performance
uniqBy performance ttt
uniqBy performance lodash vs native
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?