Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.some vs Lodash some_2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.some vs Lodash some
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="lodash.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = [...Array(100000).keys()]; var ram = Math.floor(100000 * Math.random());
Tests:
Array.prototype.some
array.some(n => n === ram)
Lodash some
_.some(array,n => n === ram)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.some
Lodash some
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what is tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to check if an element exists in an array: `Array.prototype.some()` from the JavaScript standard library and `_.some()` from the Lodash library. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **`Array.prototype.some()`**: This method checks if at least one element of the array passes the test implemented by the provided function. 2. **`.some()` from Lodash**: This method is similar to `Array.prototype.some()`, but it's part of a larger library that provides utility functions for various tasks. **Pros and Cons** * **`Array.prototype.some()`**: + Pros: Native implementation, likely optimized by the JavaScript engine. + Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable due to its concise syntax. * **`.some()` from Lodash**: + Pros: More readable and maintainable than `Array.prototype.some()`, with additional utility functions available in Lodash. + Cons: Introduces an external dependency (Lodash) and may incur a performance overhead due to the additional library. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like array manipulation, object manipulation, and more. The `_.some()` function is part of this library and provides a convenient way to check if at least one element in an array passes a test. **Other Considerations** The benchmark likely aims to compare the performance of these two approaches under different conditions, such as varying array sizes or random test values (e.g., `ram`). **Alternative Implementations** Other alternatives for checking if an element exists in an array could include: * Using a `for` loop or `forEach()` with an index check. * Utilizing `Array.prototype.indexOf()`, which returns the index of the first occurrence of the specified value, or `-1` if not found. * Leveraging other libraries like Ramda or Liskov for functional programming approaches. However, these alternatives might not be as straightforward to implement or maintain as using `Array.prototype.some()` or `.some()` from Lodash.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.some vs Lodash some
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every_2
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?