Benchmark: Switch vs Object Literal 3

Script Preparation code:

var str = 'abc';
str = str.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * 3));

Tests:

Switch
switch (str) { case 'a': console.log('A'); break; case 'b': console.log('B'); break; case 'c': console.log('C'); }
Object Literal
var objLiteral = { a: 'A', b: 'B', c: 'C' } console.log(objLiteral[str]);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Switch
Object Literal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation of the provided JSON benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to access an element in an object or string: using a `switch` statement and using an object literal with bracket notation (`objLiteral[str]`). The benchmark is designed to test which approach is faster on modern browsers, specifically Chrome 67 on Linux desktop platforms.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code sets up the initial state of the variables involved in the benchmark:
```javascript
var str = 'abc';
str = str.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * 3));
```
Here, a random character is randomly selected from the string `'abc'` and stored in the `str` variable. This ensures that the test results are not dependent on a specific input value.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition specifies two test cases:

1. **Switch**: The first test case uses a `switch` statement to access the character at index 0 of the string.
```javascript
switch (str) {
  case 'a': console.log('A'); break;
  case 'b': console.log('B'); break;
  case 'c': console.log('C');
}
```
This approach uses a switch statement with three cases, one for each character in the string.

2. **Object Literal**: The second test case uses an object literal with bracket notation to access the character at index 0 of the string.
```javascript
var objLiteral = {
  a: 'A',
  b: 'B',
  c: 'C'
}
console.log(objLiteral[str]);
```
This approach creates an object literal with three properties, one for each character in the string, and then uses bracket notation to access the value associated with the randomly selected index.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Switch**:
	* Pros:
		+ Can be more readable and concise for small switch statements.
		+ May perform better for larger switch statements due to cache effects.
	* Cons:
		+ Can be slower than object literal approaches due to the need to create a dispatch table or use binary search.
2. **Object Literal**:
	* Pros:
		+ Typically faster than switch statements due to the ability to directly access properties using bracket notation.
		+ More flexible and can be used with larger objects.
	* Cons:
		+ May require more memory allocation for large objects.
		+ Less readable for small objects or simple cases.

**Library Used**

The benchmark does not explicitly use any external libraries. The `console.log` function is part of the built-in JavaScript API, and the object literal creation and bracket notation are standard JavaScript syntax.

**Special JS Features**

There are no special JavaScript features used in this benchmark beyond the standard syntax for object literals and switch statements.

**Alternative Approaches**

Other approaches to access an element in an object or string include:

1. **Array Indexing**: Accessing an array using index arithmetic, e.g., `arr[str]`.
2. **Regular Expressions**: Using regular expressions with `String.match()` or `String.test()`, e.g., `/abc/.exec(str)[0]`.
3. **Using a Map**: Creating a map object and using its `get()` method to access the element at index 0, e.g., `var map = new Map(); map.set('a', 'A'); map.get(str)`.

Related benchmarks:

Switch vs Object Literal 3 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Switch vs Object Literal

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Switch

Object Literal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):