Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
eval vs Function
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
eval vs new Function
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var f = "() => 'yo'"
Tests:
eval
eval(f);
new Function
Function(`"use strict";return ${f}`)()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
eval
new Function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Purpose** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using the `eval()` function and creating a new anonymous function using the `Function()` constructor. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **`eval(f);`**: This approach uses the built-in `eval()` function to execute the provided string as JavaScript code. The string `f` is defined in the Script Preparation Code section of the benchmark definition and contains an arrow function. 2. **`Function(`"use strict";return ${f}`)()`**: This approach creates a new anonymous function using the `Function()` constructor. The string `f` is passed as an argument to the constructor, which returns the created function. The function body is wrapped in an immediately invoked expression (IIFE) to ensure it's executed immediately. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`eval(f);`**: * Pros: + Simple and straightforward implementation. + Allows for dynamic evaluation of arbitrary JavaScript code strings. * Cons: + Can be slow due to the overhead of parsing and executing the string as code. + Can pose security risks if used with untrusted input, as it can execute arbitrary code. 2. **`Function(f)();`**: * Pros: + Provides a more controlled execution environment compared to `eval()`, reducing security risks. + Allows for better performance due to the optimized compilation of the function body. * Cons: + More complex implementation compared to `eval()`. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark, but it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript implementations (e.g., V8) provide optimized functions like `Function()` that can outperform traditional `Function()` constructors. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, the use of arrow functions (`() => 'yo'`) is a relatively recent feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to create and execute anonymous functions could be used instead of `eval()` or the `Function()` constructor: 1. **`with` statement**: Not recommended due to its legacy nature and performance issues. 2. **`eval()` with a `with` clause**: Similar to using `with` alone, but still carries security risks. 3. **`new Function(f)`**: Another approach to create an anonymous function, which can be more efficient than the traditional `Function()` constructor. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide identical performance characteristics as the benchmarked approaches.
Related benchmarks:
eval vs new Function
eval vs new Function (fix)
window.eval function vs new Function2
eval vs evalFunction vs function
eval vs evalFunction vs function vs anonymous function
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?