Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
DOM traversal
(version: 0)
Yeah!
Comparing performance of:
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="bar"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p> <p class="foo"></p>
Tests:
querySelector
document.querySelector('.bar')
getElementsByClassName
document.getElementsByClassName('bar')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelector
getElementsByClassName
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its options. **What is tested?** The provided benchmark measures the performance of two DOM traversal methods: `document.querySelector` and `document.getElementsByClassName`. These methods are used to select elements within an HTML document using CSS selectors. **Options compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **`document.querySelector('.bar')`**: This method uses a single selector (`'.bar'`) to select an element that matches the specified class. 2. **`document.getElementsByClassName('bar')`**: This method uses a multiple selector (`'[class=bar]'`) to select all elements that have the `bar` class. **Pros and cons of each approach** 1. **`document.querySelector('.bar')`** * Pros: + More efficient, as it only selects one element. + Less overhead due to the use of a single selector. * Cons: + May not find all elements with the specified class if there are multiple classes or attributes on the element. 2. **`document.getElementsByClassName('bar')`** * Pros: + Guarantees finding all elements with the specified class, even if they have additional classes or attributes. * Cons: + More overhead due to the use of a multiple selector and iterating over all matching elements. **Library usage** The `getElementsByClassName` method uses the `Element.prototype.getElementsByClassName` method from the W3C DOM specification. This method is part of the ECMAScript standard, ensuring compatibility across different browsers. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to compare other DOM traversal methods, some alternatives could be: 1. `document.getElementsByTagName('p')` (using a single tag name) 2. `document.querySelectorAll('.bar')` (using the CSS query selector API) 3. `document.querySelectorAll('.bar')` (also using the CSS query selector API) However, these alternatives would not necessarily provide the same level of performance comparison as the original benchmark, which specifically focuses on comparing the efficiency of `querySelector` and `getElementsByClassName`.
Related benchmarks:
DOM traversal
test class
DOM traversal Compare
DOM traversal Compare 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?