Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
if vs snake
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
if vs snake
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
if
var j2p32 = Math.pow(2, 32); var i = 10000; var x = 0; var y = -12; while(i--) { x = (y >= 0 ? y : j2p32 + y) } console.log(x);
snake
var j2p32 = Math.pow(2, 32); var i = 10000; var x = 0; var y = -12; while(i--) { x = y >>> 0; } console.log(x);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
if
snake
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark. The benchmark is comparing two approaches for handling unsigned integer arithmetic: bitwise operations (specifically, the "snake" approach) versus conditional statements with ternary expressions (the "if" approach). **Options compared:** 1. **Bitwise operations**: The "snake" approach uses the bitwise right shift operator (`>>> 0`) to convert a negative number to its absolute value. 2. **Conditional statements with ternary expressions**: The "if" approach uses an if-else statement with a conditional expression `(y >= 0 ? y : j2p32 + y)` to achieve the same result. **Pros and Cons:** * **Bitwise operations (snake)**: + Pros: - Can be faster due to compiler optimizations - Less code is required, making it easier to read and maintain + Cons: - May require additional CPU cycles for the shift operation - Limited support on older browsers or devices that don't support bitwise operations * **Conditional statements with ternary expressions (if)**: + Pros: - More widely supported across different browsers and devices - Easier to understand and maintain for developers familiar with conditionals + Cons: - Requires more code, making it potentially slower or less efficient **Library/Language features:** None of the test cases use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript engines like V8 (used by Chrome) may have internal optimizations or limitations that affect the performance of these operations. **Special JS feature/Syntax:** The "snake" approach uses the bitwise right shift operator (`>>> 0`), which is a relatively niche operation in JavaScript. While it's widely supported, some older browsers or devices might not implement this operator correctly, potentially affecting performance. **Other alternatives:** There are other approaches to handle unsigned integer arithmetic in JavaScript, such as using a library like [Bitwise](https://www.npmjs.com/package/bitwise) or implementing custom arithmetic logic. However, the "if" and "snake" approaches are likely among the most common and widely supported methods. It's worth noting that measuring the performance of these operations can vary depending on the specific JavaScript engine, browser, and device being used. The benchmark results provided may not be representative of other scenarios or environments.
Related benchmarks:
if(!variable) vs if(variable===undefined) performance
if (!x) syntax vs if (x === undefined)
JS if/ vs if/else
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for complex objects
in vs simple if
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?