Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash.keys vs Object.keys with a large object
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
lodash.keys vs native
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var objectMap = {}; for(var i=0; i<800000; i++){ objectMap[i] = { a: Math.random(), b: Math.random() }; }
Tests:
lodash.keys
_.keys(objectMap)
native
Object.keys(objectMap)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash.keys
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The provided benchmark definition json represents two test cases that compare the performance of `_.keys` from the Lodash library with the native `Object.keys` method in JavaScript. **What is tested:** In this benchmark, we're testing the speed of: 1. **Native Object.keys**: This is the built-in method for getting an array of a given object's own enumerable property names. 2. **Lodash keys (_.keys)**: This function is part of the Lodash library and returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property names. **Options compared:** The two options being compared are: 1. Using the native `Object.keys` method 2. Using the Lodash `_.keys` function **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Native Object.keys**: * Pros: + Built-in, no additional dependencies required. + Likely to be highly optimized by JavaScript engines. * Cons: + May require more memory accesses since it's an array method. 2. **Lodash _.keys**: * Pros: + May be more efficient than native `Object.keys` for very large objects due to optimized implementation. + Reduces the need for manual property iteration. * Cons: + Requires including the Lodash library, which adds a dependency. **Library and purpose:** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functional programming helpers. The `_.keys` function returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property names. In this benchmark, Lodash _.keys is used to compare its performance with the native `Object.keys` method. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None mentioned in this specific benchmark definition. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative methods to get an array of a given object's own enumerable property names, you could consider: 1. **for...in**: A traditional loop-based approach that iterates over the object's properties using `in`. 2. **Object.getOwnPropertyNames()**: Returns an array of all properties (including non-enumerable ones) of an object. 3. **Reflect.ownKeys()**: A modern JavaScript method (introduced in ECMAScript 2018) that returns an array of an object's own property names. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the native `Object.keys` or Lodash _.keys methods.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.map vs Lodash map
Array.prototype.map vs Lodash.map on large data
Loop over object: lodash vs Object.entries vs Object.keys vs Object.values
Loop over object: lodash vs Object.entries vs Object.values vs Object.keys (lodash 4.17.15)
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?