Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
empty object
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
keys vs values vs json
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
keys
const obj = {test1: 1, test2: 2, test3: 3}; const isEmpty = Object.keys(obj).length === 0; return isEmpty;
values
const obj = {test1: 1, test2: 2, test3: 3}; const isEmpty = Object.values(obj).length === 0; return isEmpty;
json
const obj = {test1: 1, test2: 2, test3: 3}; const isEmpty = JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}'; return isEmpty;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
keys
values
json
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website where users can create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark measures how quickly different browsers can execute simple object property access patterns using `Object.keys()` and `Object.values()`, as well as JSON stringification with an empty object. **Test Cases** There are three test cases: 1. **"keys"`**: This test case checks if an object has any properties by comparing the length of `Object.keys(obj)` to 0. It returns true if the object is empty and false otherwise. 2. **"values"`**: Similar to the previous test case, but it uses `Object.values(obj)` instead of `Object.keys(obj)`. This test checks if an object has any values (i.e., properties with a non-empty value). 3. **"json"`**: In this test case, the benchmark measures the time it takes to check if an empty JSON string is equal to "{}". The comparison uses the `===` operator. **Options Compared** The options compared in these tests are: * Using `Object.keys()` vs. using `Object.values()` * Using direct property access (e.g., `obj.test1`) vs. checking for emptiness using a function like `Object.keys(obj).length === 0` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Using `Object.keys()`**: * Pros: It is generally faster than using `Object.values()` because it returns an array of only the property names, which can be more efficient for objects with many properties. * Cons: It will return an empty array if the object has no properties, but this may not be desirable behavior in all cases (e.g., if you expect the object to always have some properties). 2. **Using `Object.values()`**: * Pros: It returns a collection of values, which can be useful if you need to iterate over an object's values. * Cons: It is generally slower than using `Object.keys()` because it needs to create an array of all the property values. 3. **Direct Property Access**: This approach is not tested in this benchmark, but it would involve accessing individual properties directly (e.g., `obj.test1`). The pros and cons of this approach include: * Pros: It can be faster than using `Object.keys()` or `Object.values()`, especially for small objects. * Cons: If the object is large, this approach can be slower because it needs to access each property individually. **Library** None of these tests use a specific JavaScript library. However, if you're interested in knowing more about libraries that provide similar functionality, some examples include: * Lodash: Provides `_.keys()` and `_.values()` functions for working with objects. * Ramda: Provides `R.keys` and `R.values` functions for functional programming. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, if you're interested in learning more about advanced topics like: * Async/await * Promises * Generators Feel free to ask! **Other Alternatives** If you want to create your own benchmark using a different approach, here are some alternatives: * Use the `Map` data structure instead of objects. * Compare performance using the `Intl.NumberFormat` API for date formatting or other common tasks. * Experiment with different array methods like `Array.prototype.filter()`, `Array.prototype.map()`, etc. These alternative approaches can help you create a unique benchmark that targets specific aspects of JavaScript performance.
Related benchmarks:
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs empty body
Object assign vs Property change
Delete vs set undefined Properties
Lodash isEmpty vs Native Javascript
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?