Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operator 22222
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: `Object.assign` and the spread operator (`...`). The goal is to measure which approach is faster in JavaScript. **What is being tested?** * Two functions are being compared: + `Object.assign`: a built-in JavaScript method that copies properties from an object to another object. + Spread operator (`...`): a syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows creating new objects by spreading the properties of an existing object. * The benchmark is testing how fast each approach is when copying an object's properties into a new object. **Options compared** The two options being compared are: 1. `Object.assign`: uses the built-in JavaScript method to copy properties from one object to another. 2. Spread operator (`...`): uses a syntax feature to create a new object by spreading the properties of an existing object. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** * `Object.assign`: + Pros: - Widely supported across different browsers and JavaScript engines. - Can be used with any type of objects, including arrays and functions. + Cons: - Can be slower than the spread operator due to its method call overhead. * Spread operator (`...`): + Pros: - Faster than `Object.assign` since it's a syntax feature that doesn't require a method call. - More concise and readable code. + Cons: - Not supported in older JavaScript engines (before ES6) or some browsers. - Requires more memory to create a new object. **Library used** None of the provided benchmark definitions use any external libraries. **Special JS feature or syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a special syntax feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows creating new objects by spreading the properties of an existing object. If you're not familiar with this syntax, don't worry; it's widely adopted and used in modern JavaScript development. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to test other approaches, some alternative methods could be: * Using a library like Lodash or Ramda for object manipulation. * Implementing a custom function for copying properties from one object to another. * Using a different approach altogether, such as using the `JSON.parse` and `JSON.stringify` methods. However, these alternatives are not part of the original benchmark definition and would require additional modifications to the test code.
Related benchmarks:
math pow vs bit shifting vs **
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
Number constructor vs double tilde
math pow vs bit shifting vs exponentiation operator
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?