Benchmark: angular.element.addClass vs element.classList

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="element"></div>

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.16.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.5.8/angular.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

const element = document.getElementById('element')

Tests:

angular.element.addClass
return angular.element(element).addClass('some');
element.classList
return element.classList.add('some');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
angular.element.addClass
element.classList

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The test case compares two approaches to add a class to an HTML element:

1. `angular.element(element).addClass('some');`
2. `element.classList.add('some');`

**Options compared:**

* Using AngularJS's `angular.element` (also known as jQuery-like API) to access the DOM element, followed by calling the `addClass` method.
* Directly using the `classList` property of the HTML element to add a class.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **AngularJS's `angular.element`**:
	* Pros:
		+ More verbose and explicit code, making it easier to understand and maintain.
		+ AngularJS provides more features and functionality for working with DOM elements.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires AngularJS library to be included in the HTML file, which can increase bundle size.
		+ Might incur additional overhead due to the jQuery-like API.
2. **Directly using `classList`**:
	* Pros:
		+ More concise and efficient code.
		+ No additional libraries or overhead.
	* Cons:
		+ Less readable if not familiar with the method.
		+ Some older browsers might not support the `classList` property.

**Other considerations:**

* The test case does not account for potential differences in browser behavior when using these two approaches. For example, some browsers might optimize the `addClass` method differently than the `classList.add()` method.
* There is no consideration for security or accessibility implications of using one approach over the other.

**Library used:**

The test case uses Lodash.js (a utility library) and AngularJS (a JavaScript framework).

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

None mentioned in this specific benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the use of `angular.element` requires knowledge of AngularJS and its API.

Now, let's look at other alternatives:

* **Vanilla JavaScript**: Instead of using `classList`, you could simply use the `style` property to add a class directly.
* **jQuery-like libraries**: Other libraries like jQuery or Vue.js might also be used instead of AngularJS's `angular.element`.
* **Native browser APIs**: Some modern browsers provide native APIs for working with DOM elements, which might be faster and more efficient than using a library.

Keep in mind that this benchmark focuses on the performance difference between two specific approaches rather than exploring these alternatives.

Related benchmarks:

angular.element.addClass vs element.classList (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: angular.element.addClass vs element.classList

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

angular.element.addClass

element.classList

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):