Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operator 1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases that compare the performance of `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (`...`) in JavaScript. Here's a breakdown of what's being tested: **Benchmark Test Cases** 1. **`Object.assign()`**: This is a built-in method in JavaScript that allows you to copy properties from one or more source objects to a destination object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: Also known as the rest parameter syntax, this operator is used to expand an array into individual arguments or to spread the elements of an array. **Comparison** The benchmark tests which approach is faster in two scenarios: * Creating a new object with some initial properties and then assigning additional properties using `Object.assign()`. * Creating a new object with some initial properties and then spreading the parameters from another object using the spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** Two approaches are being compared: 1. **`Object.assign()`**: A built-in method in JavaScript that copies properties from source objects to a destination object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: Expands an array into individual arguments or spreads the elements of an array. **Pros and Cons** * **`Object.assign()`**: + Pros: More intuitive, less verbose, and easier to read. It's also more readable when dealing with multiple sources. + Cons: Can be slower due to the additional overhead of function calls. * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: Less verbose, more concise, and often faster than `Object.assign()`. + Cons: May have a higher learning curve due to its non-intuitive syntax. Also, it's not as readable when dealing with multiple sources. **Library and Purpose** In the provided benchmark code, there is no external library being used. The tests are using built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There is no special JS feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines, like V8 (used by Chrome), have a just-in-time (JIT) compiler that can optimize code for performance. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking to compare the performance of `Object.assign()` and the spread operator in other scenarios, here are some alternatives: * You can use libraries like Lodash or Underscore.js, which provide alternative methods for object assignment. * You can test using different JavaScript engines, such as Node.js, Microsoft Edge, or Safari. Keep in mind that benchmarking code performance is complex and dependent on many factors, including the specific use case, hardware, and software configurations. MeasureThat.net's benchmarks are designed to help identify performance differences between various approaches, but it's essential to understand the context and limitations of each test.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed -> Number vs Math.round
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
toFixed vs Math.round()12
toFixed() vs String(Math.floor()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?