Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
fetch vs ajax call
(version: 0)
fetch vs ajax call
Comparing performance of:
Ajax vs Fetch
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1=/jquery.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function showResult(data) { console.log(data); } var newUrl = "https://www.googleapis.com/discovery/v1/apis";
Tests:
Ajax
var request = $.ajax({ type: "GET", url: newUrl, success: showResult, data: null });
Fetch
fetch(newUrl) .then( function(response) { response.json().then(function(data) { showResult(data); }); } ) .catch(function(err) { console.log('Fetch Error :-S', err); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ajax
Fetch
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its results. **What is being tested?** The provided benchmark compares two approaches: making an AJAX call using jQuery's `$.ajax()` method, and making a fetch request to retrieve data from a URL. **Options being compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **AJAX Call**: This option uses jQuery's `$.ajax()` method to make a GET request to the specified URL. 2. **Fetch Request**: This option uses the Fetch API to make a GET request to the specified URL. **Pros and Cons of each approach** **AJAX Call** Pros: * Widely supported and well-established * Easy to use for simple requests * Can be used with various libraries and frameworks Cons: * Requires additional library (jQuery) to be included * May have performance overhead due to the need to include an extra file * Less efficient than native Fetch API **Fetch Request** Pros: * Native API, no additional library required * More efficient than AJAX calls, as it leverages modern browser features * Simpler code and better performance Cons: * Requires a modern browser that supports the Fetch API (most recent browsers do) * May have more complex code for simple requests due to the need to handle errors and responses **Library used** In this benchmark, jQuery is used for its `$.ajax()` method. jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides an easy-to-use interface for making AJAX calls. **Special JS feature or syntax** Neither of the two options uses any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is required for basic Fetch API and AJAX call functionality. **Other alternatives** If using the Fetch API, alternative approaches include: * Using the `XMLHttpRequest` object (although less efficient) * Using a library like Axios to simplify Fetch API usage * Using a framework like React or Angular, which provide built-in support for Fetch API For making AJAX calls with jQuery, alternative approaches include: * Using the native `XMLHttpRequest` object instead of jQuery's `$.ajax()` method * Using a library like Axios to simplify jQuery-based AJAX call functionality * Implementing custom AJAX-like behavior using JavaScript and HTML5 APIs. Overall, the choice between Fetch API and AJAX calls depends on factors such as performance requirements, browser support, and personal preference. The Fetch API is generally recommended for its simplicity and efficiency.
Related benchmarks:
fetch vs ajax call (fixed)
new fetch vs ajax call
fetch vs ajax call - updated 2021
fetch vs ajax call V2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?