Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
regexp.exec: group
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
exec: nogroup vs exec: group
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var REG = /^abcde/ var G_REG = /^(abc)de/ var text = 'abcde'
Tests:
exec: nogroup
REG.exec(REG) REG.lastIndex = 0
exec: group
G_REG.exec(REG) G_REG.lastIndex = 0
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
exec: nogroup
exec: group
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two scripts, `REG` and `G_REG`, which are used to create regular expressions (`REGEX`) in JavaScript. These regular expressions are then executed on a predefined string `text`. - `REG`: `/^abcde/` - `G_REG`: `/^(abc)de/ These regular expressions test the execution of the `.exec()` method, with `REG` being a regex that will not match anything (`nogroup`) and `G_REG` being a regex that has a group in it (`group`). **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: 1. **No Group (`nogroup`)**: In this case, the regular expression `/^abcde/` is used. This means that the execution of `.exec()` will always return `null` because there's no capture group to extract a match from. 2. **With Group (`group`)**: Here, the regular expression `/^(abc)de/` is used, which includes a capture group `(abc)`. This allows the `.exec()` method to potentially return a match in the form of an object. **Pros and Cons** - **No Group (`nogroup`)**: - Pros: * Typically faster execution, as there's less work for the engine to do. - Cons: - In some cases, this can lead to false negatives (where no actual match exists) being misinterpreted as successful matches. - **With Group (`group`)**: - Pros: * Helps in handling scenarios where a match must include capture groups. For example, when looking for strings that have been modified. - Cons: - Can potentially be slower than `nogroup`, especially if the engine has to perform complex operations on the regex. **Library and Special Features** In this benchmark: - **REGEX**: Regular Expressions are a fundamental part of JavaScript for matching patterns in text. They're used extensively across web development, file system handling, and parsing data formats. - **Capture Groups (`(abc)de`)**: Capture groups are used within regular expressions to capture parts of the match and return them separately from the entire match string. **Alternatives** If you were to create benchmarks for different JavaScript execution engines or under various conditions, some alternative approaches could include: 1. **Checking String Replacement Patterns**: This might involve checking if a replacement is performed efficiently. 2. **Parsing Data Formats**: Benchmarks can be created to compare efficiency in parsing and interpreting JSON, CSV, XML, etc., across different browsers or environments. 3. **JavaScript Engine Performance under Heavy Load**: Testing how well various JavaScript engines handle performance-critical tasks under heavy loads could provide insights into scalability and resource utilization. For measuring JavaScript microbenchmarks like this one, tools like MeasureThat.net are invaluable for comparing performance of different scenarios, optimizations, or implementations across different platforms, browsers, and environments.
Related benchmarks:
.test vs .exec vs .match
RegExp.exec vs String.match +
RegEx.test vs. String.includes larger
RegEx.exec vs regex.test qp
RegEx.exec vs StrRaasdhakshjding.match
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?