Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Speed change key
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
1111 vs 2222
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const lol = {a: 1} lol["a"] = 2
Tests:
1111
const lol = {a: 1} lol["a"] = 2
2222
let lol = {a: 1} let a = {...lol, a: 2}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1111
2222
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided JSON benchmark data. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript snippet that creates an object `lol` with a single property `a` initialized to 1, and then assigns the value 2 to `lol.a`. This is done using two different approaches: * The first approach uses bracket notation (`lol[\"a\"] = 2`) which is not the most efficient way to access an object's property in JavaScript. This method can lead to slower performance due to the dynamic nature of JavaScript. * The second approach uses the spread operator (`let a = {...lol, a: 2}`) which creates a new object by copying the `lol` object and then adds a new property `a` with the value 2. This approach is more efficient than the first one because it avoids the need to use bracket notation. **Options Compared** The two approaches are compared in terms of their performance, with the second approach being faster. The benchmark data shows that the `let a = {...lol, a: 2}` approach has an execution count per second about 20 times higher than the first approach. **Pros and Cons** * **Bracket notation (`lol[\"a\"] = 2`)**: + Pros: Simple to write and understand. + Cons: Can lead to slower performance due to dynamic nature of JavaScript. * **Spread operator (`let a = {...lol, a: 2}`)**: + Pros: More efficient than bracket notation, avoids the need for dynamic property access. + Cons: Requires support for spread operators (introduced in ES6) and may not work in older browsers or environments. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the use of `let a = {...lol, a: 2}` implies the use of object destructuring and spread operators, which are built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS Features/Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** For this simple benchmark, there isn't much room for alternative approaches. However, other benchmarks may involve more complex scenarios, such as: * Using a library like Lodash to perform operations on objects * Utilizing native browser APIs (e.g., ` navigator.geolocation` or ` canvas`) that may have performance implications * Implementing custom optimizations using techniques like memoization or caching * Measuring the impact of different optimization strategies, such as minification or compression Keep in mind that the benchmark definition is very simple, and most benchmarks will involve more complex scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
lodash.mapKeys vs Native
lo vs js
Lodash.js vs Native map
Test seq vs subset
Set (Lodash vs Lodash/fp vs Immutable) comp. test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?