Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Foreaccching
(version: 0)
foreach baby
Comparing performance of:
For vs Foreach
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
For
const arr = [{a: 1}, {a: 2}, {a: 3}]; for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { arr[i].a = null; }
Foreach
const arr = [{a: 1}, {a: 2}, {a: 3}]; arr.forEach(obj => { obj.a = null; });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
For
Foreach
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain what's being tested in the provided JSON data. MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark definition provides the script code that defines the test scenario, while the individual test cases provide different ways to achieve the same goal. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition provides no specific details about what's being tested. However, based on the provided `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`, it seems like this is a test case for iterating over an array of objects in JavaScript. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **For Loop**: This test case uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over the array. ```javascript for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { arr[i].a = null; } ``` 2. **Foreach Loop**: This test case uses the `forEach()` method to iterate over the array. ```javascript arr.forEach(obj => { obj.a = null; }); ``` **Options Compared** These two approaches are compared: * Traditional `for` loop vs. `forEach()` method **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **For Loop**: * Pros: More control over the iteration process, can be used with other types of arrays (e.g., `Set`, `Map`). * Cons: Can be slower for large datasets due to the overhead of the loop variable increment. 2. **Foreach Loop**: * Pros: Faster and more concise way to iterate over arrays, does not require manual index management. * Cons: Less control over the iteration process, only suitable for arrays. **Other Considerations** Both approaches have their trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and use cases. The `forEach()` method is generally recommended for array iteration due to its simplicity and conciseness. **Library Usage** In this case, no specific library is used beyond the built-in JavaScript features (e.g., `Array.prototype.forEach()`). **Special JS Features or Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these test cases. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to iterate over arrays, consider: * Using `map()`, `filter()`, or other array methods to transform or filter the data. * Utilizing `reduce()` for aggregation operations. * Using `while` loops with manual index management (less recommended). Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the traditional `for` loop and `forEach()` method.
Related benchmarks:
ROndinelli
Loop Test (forEach vs for)
Array loop vs foreach vs for xxx
for vs foreach t23
for / forEach
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?