Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
parseVsNumber
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
parseInt vs Number
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var number = '10000'
Tests:
parseInt
parseInt(number,10);
Number
Number(number);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
parseInt
Number
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON defines two microbenchmarks, `parseVsNumber`, which measures the performance of parsing a string value as an integer versus using the built-in `Number` function. The benchmark consists of two test cases: `parseInt` and `Number`. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are being compared: 1. **Parsing with `parseInt`:** This option uses the `parseInt()` function to parse the string value `'10000'`. The first argument passed to `parseInt()` is the radix (base) of the number in the string. 2. **Converting with `Number`:** This option uses the built-in `Number` function to convert the string value `'10000'` into a numeric value. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Parsing with `parseInt`:** * Pros: * Can be faster for certain inputs, especially when dealing with non-numeric characters. * Allows for custom radix (base) specification. * Cons: * May have issues if the string contains invalid or unsupported character sets. * Can throw errors if not handled properly. * **Converting with `Number`:** * Pros: * Simple and straightforward to use. * Works well for most numeric strings. * Cons: * May be slower for certain inputs due to the overhead of using a function call. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark, but it's worth noting that `parseInt` uses the ECMAScript Internationalization API (ECMA-262) to handle radix specification. The `Number` function also leverages this same API for conversion. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The only special JavaScript feature being utilized here is the use of radix (base) in `parseInt()`. This allows for parsing string values with a specific base, which can be useful for dealing with different types of numerical data. However, as mentioned earlier, it's essential to handle invalid inputs and character sets properly when using `parseInt()`. **Alternatives** If you're looking to write similar benchmarks or want alternative approaches for comparing these functions, consider the following: * **Use a polyfill:** If you need to support older browsers that don't have native support for `Number`, you could use a polyfill library like `core-js` to provide the necessary functionality. * **Implement your own conversion function:** You can create your own custom function to convert string values to numbers, allowing you to test specific scenarios or optimizations. * **Use a benchmarking library:** Tools like Benchmark.js or Microbenchmark offer more advanced features and flexibility for writing benchmarks, including support for multiple browsers and devices. By understanding the differences between `parseInt` and `Number`, developers can make informed decisions about which approach to use in their own projects, taking into account factors like performance, security, and code readability.
Related benchmarks:
parseInt vs Number // toString vs String
Number vs + vs parseFloat 235
Implicit vs parseFloat vs Number string to num
string to number convert
Number vs + vs parseFloat v2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?