Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
using getAttribute vs property to access an element's href
(version: 0)
ok
Comparing performance of:
getAttribute vs property
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
hi <a id="yes" href="/okay">go here!!!! jkkjkkjjj don't</a>
Tests:
getAttribute
const element = document.getElementById('yes'); let i = 1000; while (i--) { // here let attr = element.getAttribute('href'); console.log(attr); }
property
const element = document.getElementById('yes'); let i = 1000; while (i--) { // here 2 let attr = element.href; console.log(attr); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getAttribute
property
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 128 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
getAttribute
173/s
property
140/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
getAttribute
173 Ops/sec
property
140 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures two approaches to access an element's `href` attribute: using `getAttribute()` or accessing it directly through the property (`href`). The goal is to determine which approach is faster, more efficient, and suitable for a specific use case. **Options Compared** 1. **Using `getAttribute()`**: This method retrieves the value of a named attribute from an element's DOM object. It takes two arguments: the element and the attribute name. 2. **Accessing through property (`href`)**: This approach directly accesses the `href` attribute as a property of the element's DOM object. **Pros and Cons** * Using `getAttribute()`: + Pros: This method is widely supported across different browsers and versions, making it more compatible. + Cons: It may be slower due to the additional overhead of calling a function to retrieve the attribute value. * Accessing through property (`href`): + Pros: Directly accessing an attribute as a property can be faster since there's no function call involved. + Cons: This approach might not work in older browsers or versions that don't support this syntax. **Library and Special JS Feature** There is no specific library used in this benchmark, but it does utilize the `document.getElementById()` method to retrieve an HTML element by its ID. The `document` object is a fundamental part of JavaScript and provides access to various web page elements. **Other Considerations** When accessing attributes or properties through the DOM, consider the following: * Browser support: Ensure compatibility with older browsers using alternative methods like `getAttribute()` or property access. * Performance: Measure the execution time for different approaches in your specific use case to determine the most efficient method. * Readability and maintainability: Choose a method that is easy to understand and maintain, especially in complex codebases. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to measure attribute or property access might include: * Using a library like jQuery, which provides its own versions of `getAttribute()` and property access. * Comparing different DOM traversal methods, such as using `querySelectorAll()`, `getElementsByTagName()`, or `getElementsByClassName()`. * Measuring the performance of accessing attributes or properties through a custom-made function. If you're interested in exploring more benchmarks like this one, you can check out MeasureThat.net's collection of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
Related benchmarks
element.getAttribute("name") vs element.attributes.name.value
using getAttribute vs property to access an element's id
using getAttribute vs innerHtml
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?