Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Parse URL domain
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
URL constructor vs Naive regexp
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.MY_URL = "http://jblas:password@mycompany.com:8080/mail/inbox?msg=1234&type=unread#msg-content"; window.RX_DOMAIN = /^\w+:\/\/(?:[\w:-]+@)?([^:/#]+)/;
Tests:
URL constructor
const url = new URL(window.MY_URL); window.result = url.hostname;
Naive regexp
window.result = window.MY_URL.match(window.RX_DOMAIN)[1];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
URL constructor
Naive regexp
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of two approaches for extracting the domain from a URL: using the `URL` constructor and using a naive regular expression (regexp) approach. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code sets up a test environment by defining two variables: * `window.MY_URL`: a sample URL string that includes a username, password, hostname, port, path, query parameters, and an anchor. * `window.RX_DOMAIN`: a regular expression pattern that matches the domain part of the URL. **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided in this benchmark, which means that the test is focused solely on the JavaScript implementation. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition specifies two test cases: 1. **URL constructor**: uses the `URL` constructor to parse the `MY_URL` string and extract the hostname. 2. **Naive regexp**: uses a simple regular expression (`RX_DOMAIN`) to match the domain part of the `MY_URL` string. **Library** In this benchmark, we don't have any external libraries being used besides the built-in `URL` constructor in modern JavaScript browsers. The `RX_DOMAIN` variable is a custom regular expression pattern defined within the script. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: * **URL constructor**: This approach provides a more robust and standardized way to parse URLs, as it uses a widely supported API. However, it may be slower than the regexp approach due to its parsing overhead. * **Naive regexp**: This approach is simpler and faster, but it relies on a custom regular expression pattern that may not cover all possible URL formats. It's also more prone to errors if the pattern doesn't match the expected format. **Other Considerations** When considering performance benchmarks like this one, keep in mind the following factors: * **Browser version**: The benchmark is run on Chrome 69, which might affect the results due to changes in JavaScript engine optimizations or URL parsing algorithms. * **Device platform and OS**: The test runs on a desktop environment with Windows as the operating system, which may influence performance compared to other platforms (e.g., mobile devices). * **Execution frequency**: The benchmark measures executions per second, which indicates how fast each approach can process the input data. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches or testing frameworks similar to MeasureThat.net, consider the following options: * **Benchmark.js**: a lightweight JavaScript library for running benchmarks. * **Benchmarklib**: a more comprehensive benchmarking framework that supports multiple languages and platforms. * **Jest-benchmark**: an integration of Jest with benchmarking capabilities. These alternatives may offer additional features or flexibility in designing your own benchmarks, but MeasureThat.net's simplicity and focus on JavaScript-specific aspects make it an excellent starting point for comparing performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
Chilinh --> RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.IndexOf
check regex vs split
check regex vs split2
check regex vs split3
check regex vs split4
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?