Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
String split vs Regex
(version: 0)
String split vs Regex
Comparing performance of:
string.split vs Regex
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'spotify:artist:3TVXtAsR1Inumwj472S9r4'
Tests:
string.split
str.split(':')[2]
Regex
str.search('[^:]+$')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
string.split
Regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark. The goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two approaches for splitting a string: using the `split()` method and using regular expressions (regex). **Split() Method** The `split()` method is a built-in JavaScript function that splits a string into an array of substrings based on a specified separator. In this case, the separator is a colon (`:`). The method returns an array where each element is a part of the original string. Pros: * Easy to use and understand * Fast for simple cases Cons: * May not work as expected if the separator is not what you expect (e.g., if it's a substring of the input string) * Can be slower than regex for more complex cases **Regular Expressions (Regex)** Regex is a way to match patterns in strings using a special syntax. In this case, the pattern is `[^:]+`, which matches one or more characters that are not colons (`:`). The `search()` method returns the index of the first occurrence of the pattern in the string. Pros: * Flexible and powerful for complex cases * Fast for most use cases Cons: * Can be difficult to read and understand, especially for complex patterns * May be slower than `split()` for very simple cases **Other Considerations** * The benchmark uses a specific input string (`"spotify:artist:3TVXtAsR1Inumwj472S9r4"`), which is likely chosen because it's easy to split and match. * The benchmark runs on Chrome 105, which might be optimized for regex performance. **Library Used** There isn't a library explicitly mentioned in the code. However, the `search()` method uses the `RegExp` object, which is a built-in JavaScript library. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's required for the test cases (e.g., no async/await, no ES6+ features). **Alternatives** Other alternatives for splitting strings include: * Using a custom implementation with a loop and string manipulation * Using other libraries like `lodash` or `underscore` * Using a different approach altogether, such as using a state machine or a finite automaton In terms of regular expressions, some alternative approaches might involve: * Using a more complex pattern to match the desired substring * Using a different regex engine (e.g., JavaScript's built-in engine vs. a third-party library) * Using a different method for searching and matching, such as `match()` or `matchAll()` Overall, this benchmark is designed to compare two common approaches for splitting strings in JavaScript: using the `split()` method and using regular expressions.
Related benchmarks:
String split vs Regex 02
double split vs regex
Split vs regexp
Regex vs Split Time
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?