Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
object: assign vs spread
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, comparing the performance of two approaches for assigning properties to an object in JavaScript: 1. **`Object.assign()`**: This method creates a new object by copying all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects into a new object. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This syntax allows you to expand an object (or any other iterable) into individual properties of another object. **Options compared** The two approaches being tested are: 1. `Object.assign()`: A method that creates a new object by copying properties from the provided source objects. 2. Spread operator: An operator that expands an object's properties into individual assignments to a target object. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **`Object.assign()`**: * Pros: + Simple and concise syntax + Well-documented and widely supported * Cons: + Creates a new object, which can be memory-intensive for large datasets + May not be as efficient as other approaches for very large datasets 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: * Pros: + More readable syntax (some might find it more intuitive) + Can be more concise than `Object.assign()` for simple cases * Cons: + Less widely supported in older browsers or environments + May not be as performant as other approaches, especially for large datasets **Library and purpose** There is no library mentioned in the provided code. The `Object.assign()` method is a built-in JavaScript method. **Special JS feature or syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a relatively new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows you to expand an object's properties into individual assignments to another object. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches, consider the following: 1. **`for...in` loop**: You can use a `for...in` loop to iterate over the source object's properties and assign them to the target object. ```javascript var target = {}; for (var key in params) { target[key] = params[key]; } ``` 2. **Array methods**: If you're working with arrays, you can use array methods like `map()` or `reduce()` to create a new array and then assign it to the target object. ```javascript var target = {}; Object.assign(target, arr.map(function (item) { return item; })); ``` Keep in mind that these alternatives might be less efficient or more verbose than `Object.assign()` or the spread operator. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested and provides a solid foundation for exploring JavaScript performance optimization!
Related benchmarks:
Spread vs Object.assign (modify ) vs Object.assign (new)
object.assign vs spread to create a copy
Object.assign mutation vs spread
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - Kien Nguyen
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?