Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Selecting Items - Lennox
(version: 0)
using getelementbyid or variables
Comparing performance of:
Var vs NoVar
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<p id="superID">Hello World</p>
Script Preparation code:
document.getElementById("superID").className = "";
Tests:
Var
var z = document.getElementById("superID"); z.className = "test";
NoVar
document.getElementById("superID").className = "test";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Var
NoVar
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript code is crucial in understanding how different approaches can impact execution speed. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case named "Selecting Items - Lennox". The test case compares two approaches for setting the class name of an HTML element: 1. Using `var z = document.getElementById("superID");` followed by `z.className = "test";` 2. Using `document.getElementById("superID").className = "test";` The goal of this benchmark is to measure the performance difference between these two approaches. **Options Compared** The two options compared in this benchmark are: 1. **Using a variable (`var z`) and then accessing its property**: This approach assigns the result of `document.getElementById()` to a variable, which can lead to additional overhead due to memory allocation, variable lookup, and potential scope issues. 2. **Accessing the element's property directly**: This approach avoids using a variable and instead accesses the `className` property directly on the element returned by `document.getElementById()`. This approach is often considered more efficient because it eliminates the need for an extra memory allocation and reduces overhead due to variable lookup. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using a variable (`var z`) and then accessing its property**: * Pros: Can make code easier to read and understand, especially in complex scenarios. * Cons: Introduces additional overhead due to memory allocation and potential scope issues. 2. **Accessing the element's property directly**: * Pros: Eliminates the need for an extra memory allocation and reduces overhead due to variable lookup. * Cons: Can make code harder to read and understand, especially for developers not familiar with this approach. **Library Used** There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that `document.getElementById()` relies on the DOM (Document Object Model) API, which is a fundamental part of the HTML standard. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax. The code snippets are straightforward and follow basic JavaScript syntax. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for setting class names on elements, here are some additional methods: * Using `element.classList.add()` (introduced in ECMAScript 2015): This method is more concise and efficient than the original two approaches. * Using a function that returns an element (e.g., `function getElement() { return document.getElementById("superID"); }`): This approach can be useful when you need to reuse the same logic or call the function multiple times. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and are more dependent on specific use cases. The original two approaches used in the benchmark (using a variable and accessing the property directly) remain good examples of basic optimization techniques.
Related benchmarks:
Different types of selecting
getElementById vs querySelector
Updating Classes v1 + jQuery
class vs id test 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?