Benchmark: earthJS vs jQuery2

HTML Preparation code:

<script>
  function v(type, selector, content) {
        const item = document.querySelectorAll(selector);

        if (type === "html") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].innerHTML = content;
            }
        } else if(type === "addClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.add(content);
            }
        } else if (type === "removeClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.remove(content);
            }
        } else if (type === "toggleClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.toggle(content);
            }
        }
    }
</script>

<div class="new-page-container"><p>Hello<p></div>

Script Preparation code:

document.querySelector(".new-page-container p").classList.remove("test");

Tests:

Native
document.querySelector(".new-page-container p").classList.add("test");
Earth JS
v("addClass", ".new-page-container p", "test");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Earth JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark defines two test cases:

1. **Native**: This test case uses the native JavaScript method `classList.add()` to add a class "test" to an HTML element with the tag name "p".
2. **Earth JS**: This test case uses the custom `v()` function from the Earth JS library, which is specifically designed for manipulating class lists on elements.

**Options Compared**

The two options being compared are:

1. Native JavaScript (`classList.add()`)
2. Custom Earth JS library (`v()` function)

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**Native JavaScript (`classList.add()`)**

Pros:

* Fast and lightweight
* Widely supported across browsers
* No additional libraries required

Cons:

* May require manual implementation for certain edge cases or browser-specific behavior
* Can be less efficient than custom implementations optimized for specific use cases

**Earth JS (`v()` function)**

Pros:

* Optimized for class list manipulation, which can result in faster execution times
* Provides a convenient and intuitive API for manipulating classes
* May offer better support for certain edge cases or browser-specific behavior

Cons:

* Requires an additional library (Earth JS) to be included
* May not be as widely supported across browsers
* Can add unnecessary overhead due to the inclusion of the library

**Library: Earth JS**

The Earth JS library is a custom-built JavaScript library designed specifically for manipulating class lists on elements. It provides a convenient and intuitive API (`v()` function) for adding, removing, and toggling classes on elements.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax (None)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark definition.

**Other Alternatives**

If the native JavaScript method `classList.add()` is not suitable for your use case, you may consider using other alternatives such as:

* jQuery's `.addClass()` method
* Vanilla JavaScript with `document.querySelector()` and `element.classList` (although this requires manual implementation)
* Browser-specific APIs, such as Chrome's `Element.classList.add()`

Keep in mind that the choice of alternative will depend on your specific requirements, browser support, and performance considerations.

In summary, the benchmark definition compares two approaches for adding a class to an HTML element: native JavaScript (`classList.add()`), which is fast and lightweight but may require manual implementation; and custom Earth JS library (`v()` function), which is optimized for class list manipulation but requires an additional library.

Related benchmarks:

earthJS vs jQuery2 (version: 0)

comparing my new earth JS

Comparing performance of: Native vs Earth JS

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native

Earth JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):