Benchmark: earthJS vs jQuery

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.3.1.min.js"></script>
<script>
  function v(type, selector, content) {
        const item = document.querySelectorAll(selector);

        if (type === "html") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].innerHTML = content;
            }
        } else if(type === "addClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.add(content);
            }
        } else if (type === "removeClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.remove(content);
            }
        } else if (type === "toggleClass") {
            for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
                item[i].classList.toggle(content);
            }
        }
    }
</script>

<div class="new-page-container"><p>Hello<p></div>

Script Preparation code:

document.querySelector(".new-page-container p").classList.remove("test");

Tests:

jQuery
$(".new-page-container p").addClass("test");
Earth JS
v("addClass", ".new-page-container p", "test");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
jQuery
Earth JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark between two JavaScript libraries: Earth JS and jQuery. The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of these libraries in adding a class to an HTML element.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **jQuery**: A popular, widely-used JavaScript library for DOM manipulation.
2. **Earth JS**: An alternative JavaScript library, as indicated by the "new earth JS" label in the benchmark definition.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

* **jQuery**:
	+ Pros: Well-maintained, widely adopted, and has a large community of developers who contribute to its ecosystem.
	+ Cons: Can be heavier-weight due to its extensive feature set, which may impact performance in certain scenarios.
* **Earth JS** (assuming it's the new library being tested):
	+ Pros: Possibly optimized for performance or has innovative features that can outperform jQuery in specific use cases.
	+ Cons: Lacks the large community and established ecosystem of jQuery, which can make it harder to find resources and support.

**Library Used**

The benchmark definition uses a custom JavaScript function `v` (short for "velocity") to add classes to an HTML element. This function is defined as:

```javascript
function v(type, selector, content) {
    const item = document.querySelectorAll(selector);

if (type === "html") {
        for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
            item[i].innerHTML = content;
        }
    } else if (type === "addClass") {
        for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
            item[i].classList.add(content);
        }
    } else if (type === "removeClass") {
        for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
            item[i].classList.remove(content);
        }
    } else if (type === "toggleClass") {
        for (let i = 0; i < item.length; i++) {
            item[i].classList.toggle(content);
        }
    }
}
```

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code is straightforward and uses standard JavaScript functionality.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative libraries to jQuery, some popular options include:

1. Lodash: A utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like DOM manipulation, string manipulation, and more.
2. VanillaJS: A lightweight, feature-rich JavaScript library that provides many of the same functionalities as jQuery without the overhead.
3. React: A popular front-end framework that uses JSX (a syntax extension for JavaScript) to simplify DOM manipulation.

Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

earthJS vs jQuery (version: 0)

comparing my new earth JS

Comparing performance of: jQuery vs Earth JS

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

jQuery

Earth JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):