Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Document Fragment Tests
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Document Fragment 1 vs Document Fragment 2
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<ul id="test-ul"> </ul> <div id="test-div"> </div>
Tests:
Document Fragment 1
var ul = document.getElementById('test-ul'); var docfrag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var browserList = ["Internet Explorer", "Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Opera"]; browserList.forEach(function(e) { var li = document.createElement("li"); li.textContent = e; docfrag.appendChild(li); }); ul.appendChild(docfrag);
Document Fragment 2
var div = document.getElementById('test-div'); var docfrag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var ul = docfrag.appendChild(document.createElement('ul')); var browserList = ["Internet Explorer", "Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Opera"]; browserList.forEach(function(e) { var li = document.createElement("li"); li.textContent = e; ul.appendChild(li); }); div.appendChild(docfrag);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Document Fragment 1
Document Fragment 2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided benchmark measures the performance of creating and appending document fragments to different HTML elements in various web browsers. **What is being tested?** The test cases are designed to create a document fragment (a new, empty HTML element) using the `document.createDocumentFragment()` method. The fragment is then appended to either an unordered list (`<ul>`) or another `div` element using the `appendChild()` method. The performance of this operation is compared across different web browsers and platforms. **Options being compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: 1. **Direct Append**: Creating a new `<ul>` element directly within the fragment (as shown in Test Case 2) versus 2. **Wrapped Append**: Wrapping the append operation around the existing `<div>` element using `appendChild()` method within the fragment (as shown in Test Case 1). **Pros and Cons of each approach** * **Direct Append** + Pros: May be more efficient, as it eliminates the overhead of creating an extra element. + Cons: Requires a new `<ul>` element to be created for every append operation, which can lead to increased memory usage and slower performance. * **Wrapped Append (using `appendChild()` within the fragment)** + Pros: Reduces memory allocation and deallocation overhead associated with creating new elements. + Cons: May introduce additional overhead due to the extra method call and potential DOM traversal. **Library used** The benchmark uses the Web API, specifically the `document.createDocumentFragment()` method, which is a part of the standard HTML5 specification. **Special JavaScript feature or syntax** None mentioned in this explanation. However, it's worth noting that modern browsers support many features and APIs, including those related to DOM manipulation and web performance optimization. **Other alternatives** Alternative approaches to create document fragments include: 1. Using `DOMTraversals` API (e.g., `traverse()` method) to traverse the DOM tree and build the fragment. 2. Utilizing a dedicated library like jQuery or React, which provides optimized DOM manipulation APIs for creating and manipulating fragments. These alternatives may offer better performance or more convenient API usage but are outside the scope of this specific benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
getElementById, querySelector, window
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
querySelector by attributte vs getElementById
querySelectorAll vs filter
performance js elements selector
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?