Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
assignment
(version: 0)
ba
Comparing performance of:
smart vs stupid
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
smart
var x; for(i=0; i<10000; i++){ (x < 0) || (x = i); }
stupid
var x; for(i=0; i<10000; i++){ if (x > -1) { x = i; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
smart
stupid
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 138 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
stupid
74K/s
smart
15K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
stupid
73,666 Ops/sec
smart
14,590 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is empty, which means that the script preparation code and HTML preparation code are not required for this specific benchmark. The script only contains a simple loop with conditional statements. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"smart"`**: This test case has a single line of code inside the loop: `(x < 0) || (x = i);`. This is an assignment expression, also known as a short-circuit assignment. It's equivalent to `if (x < 0) { x = i; } else { x = -1; }`, but it's more concise and potentially faster because it avoids the overhead of a separate if-else statement. 2. **"stupid"`**: This test case has an if-else statement inside the loop: `if (x > -1) { x = i; }`. This is a more traditional approach to assigning a value to `x` based on some condition. **Comparison of Options** In both test cases, we have two approaches: * **Assignment Expression (Smart)**: `(x < 0) || (x = i);` * **If-Else Statement (Stupid)**: `if (x > -1) { x = i; }` The pros and cons of these options are: **Assignment Expression (Smart)** Pros: * More concise code, which can lead to better performance due to fewer operations. * Can be more readable, especially for simple cases like this one. Cons: * May not work as expected in certain situations, such as when `x` is `-1` and the condition is false. In this case, `x` will remain `-1`. * Not all JavaScript engines support short-circuit assignment expressions (yet!). **If-Else Statement (Stupid)** Pros: * Guaranteed to work in all cases, even when `x` is `-1`. * More readable for some people, as it explicitly states the condition and action. Cons: * Less concise code, which can lead to slower performance due to more operations. * May be less readable for some developers who are used to shorter code. **Library Usage** There is no library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition or test cases. However, if you were to add a library, some options might include: * `mathjs`: A JavaScript library for mathematical operations. If this was used in the benchmark, it could impact performance and readability. * `lodash`: A popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions, including those related to conditional statements. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark definition or test cases. However, if you were to add them, some examples might include: * **Arrow Functions**: Used for concise code, but may not be supported by older JavaScript engines. * **Async/Await**: Used for asynchronous code, which can impact performance and readability. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to MeasureThat.net, consider the following options: 1. **Benchmark.js**: A popular benchmarking library for Node.js. 2. **Benchmark-HighPerformance**: A high-performance benchmarking library for JavaScript. 3. **JSPerf**: A simple benchmarking tool specifically designed for JavaScript. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different features, ease of use, and performance characteristics compared to MeasureThat.net.
Related benchmarks
Object Assign vs Manual Assign
this vs variable containing this
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?