Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Luxon vs Native ISO date parsing 2
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Native Date vs Luxon DateTime from native Date
Created:
5 days ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.26.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.testDate = "2024-04-09T15:16:44Z"
Tests:
Native Date
new Date(window.testDate)
Luxon DateTime from native Date
luxon.DateTime.fromJSDate(new Date(window.testDate))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Native Date
Luxon DateTime from native Date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 days ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:152.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/152.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 152 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Native Date
18.4M/s
Luxon DateTime from native Date
4.4M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
Native Date
18,374,920 Ops/sec
Luxon DateTime from native Date
4,407,406 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
luxon vs Date
luxon3 vs datefns
luxon 3.3.0 vs datefns
Luxon vs Native ISO date parsing
luxon vs Date vs luxon with js parsing
js vs luxon iso, milli, date
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?