Benchmark: pad start zero - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const hexpad = ['', '0'];
let hex = 'odd';

Tests:

template literal
if (hex.length & 1) hex = `0${hex}`;
lookup
hex = hexpad[hex.length & 1] + hex;
ternary
hex = (hex.length & 1 ? '0' : '') + hex;
ternary template literal
hex = `${(hex.length & 1 ? '0' : '')}${hex}`;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
template literal
lookup
ternary
ternary template literal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:152.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/152.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 152 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

template literal

1521.6M/s

ternary

454.0M/s

lookup

417.4M/s

ternary template literal

179.2M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ template literal	1,521,624,960 Ops/sec
ternary	454,029,504 Ops/sec
lookup	417,351,360 Ops/sec
ternary template literal	179,195,248 Ops/sec

pad start zero (version: 3)

Comparing performance of: `template literal vs lookup vs ternary vs ternary template literal`

Created: one month ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

template literal

lookup

ternary

ternary template literal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

pad start zero (version: 3)

Comparing performance of: template literal vs lookup vs ternary vs ternary template literal

Created: one month ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

template literal

lookup

ternary

ternary template literal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `template literal vs lookup vs ternary vs ternary template literal`