Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash partition VS native reduce without cloning array
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native reduce
Created:
9 days ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { arr[i] = i; }
Tests:
Lodash
var [met, rest] = _.partition(arr, function(i) { return i % 2 === 0 });
Native reduce
var [met, rest] = arr.reduce(function(acc, i) { if(i % 2 === 0) { acc[0].push(i) } else { acc[1].push(i) } return acc }, [[], []])
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native reduce
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 days ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/148.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 148 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash
190724.7 Ops/sec
Native reduce
249589.7 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Lodash reduce with native reduce
Lodash partition VS native reduce
reduce native vs lodash
Lodash vs Native reduce - 2020 test
Lodash partition VS loop
Lodash partition VS native reduce (with Lodash actually loaded)
Lodash partition VS native reduce (updated)
Lodash partition VS native reduce (updated 2)
Lodash partition VS native JS
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?