RegEx.test vs. String.includes multiple words 2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs string.includes

Created: 10 days ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

  • string.includes

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    RegEx.test
    string.includes

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 10 days ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:151.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/151.0
Firefox 151 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 12763539.0 Ops/sec
string.includes 42806064.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: