has vs includes vs convert (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: includes vs has vs convert to set then has

Created: 15 days ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • includes

  • has

  • convert to set then has

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    includes
    has
    convert to set then has

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 3 days ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.5 Safari/605.1.15
Safari 26 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
includes 108144616.0 Ops/sec
has 480587904.0 Ops/sec
convert to set then has 68930264.0 Ops/sec