Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
.test vs .startsWith
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Regex vs startsWith
Created:
one month ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Regex
const testString = 'QualtricsEOS|SV_7amJ2Dww8cWdtQh | FS_2zd0QZhebl4cRHT'; (/^QualtricsEOS\|(SV_[0-9a-zA-Z]{11,15})\|(FS_[0-9a-zA-Z]{11,15})$/).test(testString);
startsWith
const testString = 'QualtricsEOS|SV_7amJ2Dww8cWdtQh | FS_2zd0QZhebl4cRHT'; testString.startsWith('QualtricsEOS');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex
startsWith
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one month ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/147.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 147 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=628693" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Regex
16291930.0 Ops/sec
startsWith
56916992.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Performance Test: substring + indexOf x split + splice x split + [0] x regex multiple
Regex vs split/join vs substring
javascript startsWith() vs regex for longer string
Regex vs startsWith
76 _ Array.includes vs String.match
String.includes vs String.match 2
String.includes vs String.match vs String.indexOf
String.includes vs Regex.test
starts/endswith vs regex.test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?