Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
convert list and set.has vs. array.includes vs array.indexOf (string values)
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
includes vs lookup vs indexof
Created:
one month ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = [ 'height', 'width', 'maxHeight', 'maxWidth', 'maxHeight', 'minWidth', 'color', 'bg', 'backgroundColor', 'opacity', 'm', 'mt', 'mb', 'mr', 'mr', 'mx', 'my', 'p', 'pt', 'pb', 'pr', 'pl', 'px', 'py', 'border', 'boxShadow', 'flex', 'verticalAlign', 'textAlign', 'overflow', 'display', 'cursor' ]; var b = new Set(a)
Tests:
includes
return a.includes('mx')
lookup
return new Set(a).has('mx')
indexof
return a.indexOf('mx') >= 0
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
includes
lookup
indexof
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one month ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:150.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/150.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 150 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
includes
37679044.0 Ops/sec
lookup
2550005.2 Ops/sec
indexof
37749000.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
set.has vs. array.includes (string values)
set.has vs. array.includes vs array.indexOf (string values)
set.has vs. array.includes (random string values)
set.has vs. array.includes (random string values), add strings not in list
set.has vs. array.includes (random string values), add strings not in list, smaller list
set.has vs. array.includes vs array.indexOf (string values) - longer
indexOf > -1 x indexOf != -1
set.add vs array.push maan
set.has vs. array.includes vs array.indexOf (string values) 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?