Benchmark 3: UI Integration (inline script execution) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Test 1 — eval (UI script): vs Test 2 — new Function (UI script, no cache): vs Test 3 — new Function (UI script, cached): vs Test 4 — script tag (UI script):

Created: 27 days ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • Test 1 — eval (UI script):

  • Test 2 — new Function (UI script, no cache):

  • Test 3 — new Function (UI script, cached):

  • Test 4 — script tag (UI script):

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Test 1 — eval (UI script):
    Test 2 — new Function (UI script, no cache):
    Test 3 — new Function (UI script, cached):
    Test 4 — script tag (UI script):

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 27 days ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 146 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
Test 1 — eval (UI script): 179579.0 Ops/sec
Test 2 — new Function (UI script, no cache): 198166.2 Ops/sec
Test 3 — new Function (UI script, cached): 264771.3 Ops/sec
Test 4 — script tag (UI script): 47246.5 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks: