Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash V22
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Optional Chaining vs Lodash
Created:
one month ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}}
Tests:
Optional Chaining
obj.a == null ? undefined : obj.a.b == null ? undefined : obj.a.b.c == null ? undefined : obj.a.b.c.d
Lodash
_.get(obj, "a.b.c.d")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Optional Chaining
Lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one month ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 146 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Optional Chaining
191693936.0 Ops/sec
Lodash
13029799.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
_.get Benchmark Test
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash
Optional Chaining versus _.get Lodash
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash (with obj in the optional chain test)
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash aaaaa
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash without badObj
Optional Chaining versus _.get lodash simple obj
Lodash _.has vs Optional Chaining
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?