Benchmark: String() vs .toString() vs template string with oids

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/js-bson/2.0.5/bson.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

const N = 100;

const oids = Array.from({ length: N }, () => new BSON.ObjectId());

const parsed = new Array(N);

function fillParsed(transform) {
  for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
    parsed[i] = transform(oids[i]);
  }
}

Tests:

toHexString
fillParsed(oid => oid.toHexString());
toString
fillParsed(oid => oid.toString());
String
fillParsed(oid => String(oid));
template literal
fillParsed(oid => `${oid}`);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
toHexString
toString
String
template literal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 146 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
toHexString	46625.6 Ops/sec
toString	47237.5 Ops/sec
String	36370.1 Ops/sec
template literal	24425.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

String() vs .toString() vs template string with oids (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: toHexString vs toString vs String vs template literal

Created: one month ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

toHexString

toString

String

template literal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A