Benchmark: Function.prototype.apply() VS argument spread - w args :D

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function hurrr() {
	this.echo = 'oi ' 
}
hurrr.prototype.do = function() {
 	return this.echo + arguments[0]
}
hurrr.prototype.doSpread = function(args) {
 	return this.do(...args)
}
hurrr.prototype.doApply = function(args) {
 	return this.do.apply(this, args)
}
let toDo = ['hui', 'pizda', 'nikita', 'jigurda']
let durrr = new hurrr()

Tests:

apply
durrr.doApply(toDo)
spread
durrr.doSpread(toDo)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
apply
spread

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 143 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
apply	38507532.0 Ops/sec
spread	37847716.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Function.prototype.apply() VS argument spread - w args :D (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: apply vs spread

Created: 3 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

apply

spread

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A