map vs obj filling and accessing (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Filling map vs Filling object vs Accessing map vs Accessing object

Created: 6 months ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 6 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 6 runs
Accessing object
47/s
Filling object
35/s
Accessing map
27/s
Filling map
23/s

Fastest: Accessing object (2.1x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ Accessing object: 47 ops/sec
  • • Filling object: 35 ops/sec
  • • Accessing map: 27 ops/sec
  • • Filling map: 23 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Filling map
    Filling object
    Accessing map
    Accessing object

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 143 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Accessing object
34/s
Filling object
28/s
Accessing map
22/s
Filling map
19/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ Accessing object 34 Ops/sec
Filling object 28 Ops/sec
Accessing map 22 Ops/sec
Filling map 19 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks