Benchmark: estoolkit vs native structuredClone

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/es-toolkit@%5E1"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
  jayson: {
    stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
    parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
  }
};

var myCopy = null;

Tests:

estoolkit
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
native
myCopy = structuredClone(MyObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
estoolkit
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 143 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

native

317K/s

estoolkit

279K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ native	316,935 Ops/sec
estoolkit	278,921 Ops/sec

estoolkit vs native structuredClone (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `estoolkit vs native`

Created: 7 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

estoolkit

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

estoolkit vs native structuredClone (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: estoolkit vs native

Created: 7 months ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

estoolkit

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `estoolkit vs native`