Benchmark: _.replace(line, /\r\n|\n/, '') vs .indexOf('/n')

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

var shortString = "Short string without newline";
var longString = "This is a very long string that represents a large amount of text data potentially copied from a web upload form. It does not contain any newline characters initially but we want to check the performance impact of running a regex replace vs a simple indexOf check.";
var longStringWithNewline = longString + "\n" + longString;
var regex = /\r\n|\n/;

Tests:

_.replace
_.replace(longString, regex, '');
.indexOf(/n)
if (longString.indexOf('\n') > -1 || longString.indexOf('\r') > -1) { longString.replace(regex, ''); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.replace
.indexOf(/n)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Whale/4.35.351.13 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
_.replace	28899120.0 Ops/sec
.indexOf(/n)	33167826.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

_.replace(line, /\r\n|\n/, '') vs .indexOf('/n') (version: 1)

_.replace(line, /\r\n|\n/, '') vs .indexOf('/n')

Comparing performance of: _.replace vs .indexOf(/n)

Created: 4 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

_.replace

.indexOf(/n)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A