Benchmark: Test c vs t - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

const get_c = (x,y,s) => {
	return "translate(" + x + "px," + y + "px) scale(" + s + ")"
}

const get_t = (x,y,s) => {
	return `translate(${x}px,${y}px) scale(${s})`
}

Tests:

concat
let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 240; ++i) { nums.push(get_c(i * 520,i * 540,8)); }
template
let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 240; ++i) { nums.push(get_t(i * 520,i * 540,8)); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
concat
template

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
concat	179762.8 Ops/sec
template	179175.3 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

reduce vs loop
reduce vs loop
Pojo vs functions
Math.imul vs. polyfill
lambdas2
Test shitty shit
prepared lambda
prepared lambda2
loop vs raw fn

Test c vs t (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: concat vs template

Created: 4 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

concat

template

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A