Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
RegEx.test vs. multiple includes
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
RegEx.test vs String.includes
Created:
4 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const string = 'Hello world!' const searchA = 'Hello' const searchB = 'world' const regex = /Hello|world/;
Tests:
RegEx.test
regex.test(string)
String.includes
string.includes(searchA) string.includes(searchB)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
4 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:146.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/146.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 146 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=622306" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
RegEx.test
45569524.0 Ops/sec
String.includes
918629504.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match
RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.indexOf
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.indexOf
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive
RegEx.test vs String.includes
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match (multiple words in regex)
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match(Regex)
RegEx.test (with inline regex) vs. String.includes vs. String.match
Long regex test vs string includes
Longer regex test vs string includes
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?